đ§ Airbnbâs relaunch and the texture era of design
High-touch aesthetics show that you care.
The housing rental platform is becoming a high-touch lifestyle app, and crystallizing a new design trend in the process. But can any trend survive AI replication?
Kyle Chayka: Airbnb recently rebooted itself. In its annual âsummer releaseâ on May 13, the co-founder and CEO Brian Chesky essentially announced a new era for the app. Airbnb is no longer just about home rentals; itâs a place to get âExperiencesâ and âServicesâ, anything from a surfing lesson to a haircut or prepared meals. Chesky has been presenting this as a kind of personal, mind-blowing epiphany, as recounted in a slyly mocking Wired profile, complete with glamorous CEO photo shoot. Chesky compared himself to Jack Kerouac, spewing 10,000 words of a manifesto: âI dusted off all my ideas from 2012 to 2016. I basically said, âWeâre not just a vacation appâweâre going to be a platform, a community.ââ Same! Who among us is not a platform, a community?
Experiences have already failed for Airbnb once. It turns out itâs harder to productize and scale human-to-human interaction than renting out empty houses. Whatâs more interesting than the pivot is the aesthetic. Airbnb has always been a design-forward company, its brand as prominent as its tech. After the relaunch, its icons are softly rounded pictographs, like custom emoji. The icon for the services tab on the homepage is a bellhop bell that animates when you click on it; the Experiences icon is a cute hot-air balloon. There are icons of tiny landscapes, tiny cameras, tiny massage tables.
As Chesky later posted on X, itâs an intentional shift away from generic geometric designs and toward texture and form. With the tiny, detailed scenes and the dynamic animations, your eye has something to grab on to, to figure out. Itâs not the frictionless reductionism of the 2010s (think of Uber) or the hyper-minimalism of ChatGPT. âSkeuomorphismâ is the design strategy of making digital objects look like what they refer to in physical space. It was unfashionable for a while, but now itâs back.
Carly Ayres wrote an insightful newsletter, âwhy everyone is suddenly so thirsty for designers,â about the shift:
Flat design dominated the last decade. Its aestheticâclean, quiet, systematizedâmapped neatly to the metrics-driven culture of post-2010s tech. Skeuomorphism, by contrast, is maximalist, opinionated, and expensive. It implies care. It doesnât scale easily. Is this return to skeuomorphism a sign of renewed commitment or a nostalgic provocation? Are we celebrating the icons, or what they represent?
That âcareâ really stuck in my mind. Care is about intention, patience, and impact. Itâs the opposite of scalability; scalability is when you donât care, when you think that the same user experience should be applied to everyone on earth. Airbnb was a vector of that kind of scalability as it popularized the generic international minimalism of AirSpace, a flattening of aesthetic taste. Care, however, is against flattening. Airbnb now has to reinforce a sense of intimacy and specificity because itâs trying to promote (and sell) person-to-person interaction, IRL.
And yet! Any aesthetic innovation is relentlessly adopted and co-opted until it comes to signify its opposite. Weâll see more tech companies follow in Airbnbâs wake; a design entrepreneur on X already demonstrated how he used AI to replicate the skeuomorphic, rounded, animated icons, effortlessly whipping up a coffee machine. Care is also the opposite of automation; itâs a barista making a cappuccino with latte art for you by hand instead of a Nespresso machine pod. But AI makes automation almost irresistible. Itâs increasingly difficult to signify quality in any kind of visual or brand choice, because anyone can catch up to you more or less overnight.
Which makes for a quandary: Do you need more design to show that you care, or less to show that itâs real? Iâll be watching for further examples of hyper-textured design, but Iâll also be slightly suspicious of it, looking for something that canât be faked.
Recently on One Thing:
đ§ Summer survival shopping recs
đ§ Mass matcha vs. craft matcha




Figma recently updated their interface with the same approach - showing big pencil icons. Iâm not yet sure if itâs infantalizing (in that specific case) UI and ingnores the fact that weâre gone a long way of navigating through the digital sphere.
Couldn't agree more, on all counts. Sure, sure, experiences. BUT THOSE ICONS?!